Todayās question comes from TadeasĀ whoĀ wants me to review this hand played with JJĀ at 25NL.Ā In this hand there is a raise under the gun, thereās a call, thereās a squeeze, and itās back to us.
Tadeas prefaces the hand by saying, āI have Jacks under the gun, I make a standard raise, thereās a call and a squeeze from a player I only have 20 hands on and heās played quite tight so far, but the reality can differ greatly.ā First and foremost, Tadeas, itās excellent that you recognize that 20 hands is not a great sample size and thereās going to be a lot of variance, especially in things like play style. Tadeas goes on to say, āI consider him to be rather fishy because of his stack but the sizing of his squeeze seems okay. I really only think of calling here as I think folding is too nitty, but stack off is too optimistic.ā
There are a bunch of things in that write-up that I agree with. Yes, 20 hands is not a huge sample size, thereās going to be a bunch of variance is play styles as far as the stats are concerned. Two, he did not start the hand with a full stack, so yeah I agree starting with 80 big blinds is a little bit odd and not necessarily something that I think a great player would do. Yes, I agree that his squeeze size is totally fine. Then I also agree that I think folding is too nitty.
Now just because folding is too nitty does not necessarily mean that I have to call simply because stacking off is, and I quote, ātoo optimistic.ā Letās think real quick about what we have here. We have a 6 max game, we raised and someone decided to squeeze on the button. Does that mean that that person only has the nuts or a super nuttish range when they squeeze? I donāt think so. I donāt think thereās any reason to think that thatās the case here. Because of that, Iām not thinking about folding.
Then I ask myself, āokay if I call what happens?ā Well if we decide to call, like Hero did, weāre giving Chicken Dinner a great price, plus heās closing action, and weāre essentially allowing him to actualize any chunk of his equity with things like pocket 4s, pocket 8s, connectors, Ace-10, all that kind of stuff. Usually I donāt want to just allow people to actualize equity for very, very cheap against me, so I donāt particularly love flatting and just letting him get involved and now all of a sudden weāre out of position in a 3-way pot thatās going to be pretty awkward and bloated and just not really where I think my edge is going to lie.
Which then pushes me back to really hardcore exploring the 4-bet. You can actually proof the exact value of a 4-bet commit mindset by using a fold equity calculator. Weāve done that a bunch in other videos so Iām not going to go through it here, I think at this point itās kind of becoming repetitive math, but you can definitely proof it if you wanted to. In this situation I would just think about and say, okay Zachu probably doesnāt just have the nuts. First and foremost itās 6 max, secondly I donāt think thereās any reason to think that he only has like Kings plus or Queens plus Ace-King here; I think thereās going to be other stuff in there.
Just for the record, when he does have something like Queens plus Ace-King, if we do decide to commit it, if we just do a basic equity calculation, Jack still has 36 percent equity against that, and if we think thereās any percentage chance that Zachu is going to commit with a wider range, letās say 10s plus, Ace-Queen plus, then you notice that our equity just gets higher and higher. This is not a situation where Iām considering trying to get away from this by any stretch. I think thereās a lot of value actually in just fighting for this. Thereās already 5 dollars in the middle, thatās 20 big blinds that we can start contending for right this moment. If thereās any shade at all in Zachuās range, things that would squeeze and then fold, then weāre just picking up 5 dollars uncontested that chunk of the time, and the rest of the time weāre getting in with varying equity that at minimum is going to be 36 percent and on average is probably going to be significantly higher.
This is a situation where I think a lot of players do flat because itās comfortable. They get to see what happens, they get to see how the flop rolls out, and then they make decisions from there. I donāt think this is best spot to. Iād much rather attack, let Zachu know that heās not going to be squeezing every single time that I open, thereās a caller, and he just decides to go wild on it. I want to shut that action down. Again, I donāt mind getting it in, and yes sometimes Iām going to get it in and Iām going to be against Kings and itās going to suck, but it is what it is, itās built into the whole equation. So donāt fear getting it in in gambling a little bit. Youād actually be surprised the times you do get it in how often Zachu will show up with something like pocket 10 or maybe something a little bit lighter, or maybe you go up to something like 7.50 here and he decides to think that there is any semblance of fold equity and makes a shove with whatever nonsense he has. A lot of players just play too nitty in these situations. Yes, folding is too nitty, but I think always calling here and avoiding stacking off with anything other than exactly Queens plus or exactly Kings plus is doing yourself a disservice.
Okay, Iām just going to breeze through the rest of the hand, because we do end up calling, Chicken Dinner decides to fold. Go heads up to it. Hero decides to check-call on this flop, and this is a flop where I would just check-raise and get it all in. Now, we think about it, we got to this flop with a little over 2SPR, so Iām kind of already in a commitment mindset as is, and Iām also thinking that Zachu could have things like 9s, 10s, things like that that Iād like to get in it with, and Iām also cool if I shut out his equity if he has something like Ace-King or Ace-Queen. Again, all thatās kind of taken into consideration when I think about why I like to 4-bet a preflop as opposed to just flat it.
In this scenario here, decides to go for the check-call, and again all the check-call does is allow your opponent to actualize his equity on his terms, and youāre putting yourself in a situation where youāre probably going to check-call down a lot of the time anyway, but youāre just allowing Zachu to improve with things like Ace-King, Ace-Queen, and even possibly slow down with something like 10s if say a bad turn card rolls off or a bad river card rolls off.
As played, the turn goes check-check, Ace on the river, and Hero decides to check-call. Now Hero ends up winning this pot, and thatās all well and good I guess, but this is one of those where when you look at Zachuās line ā squeeze preflop, C-bet flop, check behind turn, and then drill it on the Ace, I think youāre going to be looking at Ace-King, Ace-Queen a little bit more often than you want to. I donāt think that heās going to check the turn behind with overpairs and stuff, and thus when he drills the Ace it really looks like something like Ace-King, Ace-Queen, that looks realistic. Now yeah, at the end of the day we won the pot, thatās all well and good.
Again, the fact that you see this kind of hand means that the squeeze range was probably wider than you originally thought, and again lose even more validity for 4betting the preflop. Even when playing online poker (or via new online casinos which are pronounced uudet nettikasinot in Finish), not every player is a multitabling nit.
Chances are when you 4bet he probably actually goes away, and thatās okay. Youāre picking up 5 dollars uncontested preflop, canāt complain about that, and youāre being more and more aggressive, as opposed to constantly playing on your heels by just flatting anyone elseās aggression when you donāt have exactly Queens plus or exactly Kings plus type stuff.
As players begin dipping into the world of GTO, one of the first concepts they…
When delving into advanced poker strategy, two terms frequently emerge: Game Theory Optimal (GTO) and…
Poker contains a lot of repetitive math, especially when studying poker hands away from the…